According to the FAA, “NextGen is the FAA-led modernization
of our nation’s air transportation system. Its goal is to increase safety,
efficiency, capacity, predictability, and resiliency of American aviation”
(FAA, 2017). NextGen has all these effects by consolidating dozens of
innovative technologies, capabilities, and procedures. The National Airspace
System (NAS) with NextGen will transform how users see, navigate, and
communicate. With ADS-B and other implementations, NextGen provides air traffic
controllers with exact aircraft locations and a clear picture of surrounding
conditions. NextGen includes a switch from ground-based to satellite-enabled
navigation systems that are more precise. The satellites enable the FAA to
create optimum routes anywhere in the NAS for departing, cruise altitude,
approach and arrival operations. Data communications, a new digital
communication method, help pilots and controllers communicate more quickly,
more easily, and with less risk of miscommunication than radio (FAA, 2017).
GA has traditionally spoken against privatization because of
the concern of user fees. A company in charge of air traffic controlled would
be concerned about profit, while the current system is government service that isn’t
designed as a for-profit enterprise. Recently, the EAA posted an article called
“You Did It! GA Turns Back Privatization”. The article, posted at the end of February,
announced that ATC privatization language has been removed from an FAA reauthorization
bill in the U.S. House of Representatives, as a result of the efforts of more
than 200 aviation associations and advocates (EAA, 2018).
The airlines have been in favor of ATC privatization.
Airlines are pushing for privatization so that they can gain more control over
air traffic control, so that they can get priority. According to an article by
the Alliance for Aviation Across America, privatization “would allow the
airlines to collude and engage in anti-competition behavior” and “privatization
would not alleviate delays or costs” (Alliance for Aviation Across America).
Canada, north of us, is an example of a country that has
privatized ATC. Air traffic has been controlled by Nav Canada, an Ottawa-based
non-profit, since 1996. Nav Canada oversees air traffic control and Transport
Canada oversees the safety of Nav Canada. Under the same model, the FAA would
oversee the safety of a private ATC enterprise. The system would be funded by
user fees. Privatized ATC systems are as safe as a government system, and in
Canada, the ATC system is managed so that it breaks even every year, and last
month, it announced a rate reduction and fee refund of $44.5 million US
(Bachman, 2017).
For converting to a private system, a bill would have to go
through Congress and the President would have to sign it. Since the
privatization language was recently removed from the FAA reauthorization bill that
is being worked on in the House, ATC privatization does not look like it has a
strong likelihood of being implemented. A new bill would have to go through Congress,
and the FAA would have to transfer the ATC system to a private organization. Trump
says that privatized ATC is a “no-brainer”, but without Congressional support,
Trump can’t mandate the FAA to privatize it.
I
do not think that ATC privatization would be a good thing. Currently, most of
the FAA’s funds are generated by taxes on aviation fuel, fees and taxes. The
FAA is a government entity that can be unbiased about providing fair service at
a fair price. The concern of a privatized ATC organization, is that airlines
would receive preferential treatment, or be able to buy it, while general
aviation users would be stuck with second-class service and user fees. As a
general aviation pilot, I want to be able to fly freely, like aviation has been
for the last hundred plus years.
Alliance for Aviation Across America. (n.d). The truth about big airlines push to privatize our
nation’s air traffic control system. Aviation Across America. Retrieved from https://www .aviationacrossamerica.org/issues/privatization/
Bachman, J. (6 June 2017). Will privatized air traffic control put you in danger? Bloomberg.
Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-06/will-privatized-
air-traffic-control-put-you-in-danger
Experimental Aircraft Association. (27 February 2018). You
did it! GA turns back privatization
grab, Experimental Aircraft Association. Retrieved from https://www.eaa.org/en/eaa/e
aa-news-and-aviation-news/news/02-28-2018-you-did-it-ga-turns-back-privatization-grab
Federal Aviation Administration. (4 December 2017). How
NextGen works. Federal Aviation
Administration.
Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/
I agree with you when you say privatizing the ATC in this country is not a good idea. I also agree with your reasons but while reading your blog I thought you'd be for it. You raise some valid points about how it's run now and how it could be run if it gets privatized.
ReplyDeleteI agree with several of your statements. I think that passing on the ATC system to private companies would largely influence the way air traffic is handled in the country. My concern is that more frequent changes in key technological components within the system could change the way people understand how the ATC system operates, and lead to much confusion among pilots that use the system frequently. It would be similar to changing driving on the right side of the road to the left hand side.
ReplyDelete